🔗 Share this article

Europe felt a moment of respite on Monday, as the crisis sparked by the announcement of a new 28-article proposal for ending the war appeared – momentarily – to have been stabilised. A American diplomat spoke of "notable headway" after Ukraine-US talks in Geneva. On Monday night, Moscow made its retaliation: an extensive attack of missile and drone strikes on Kyiv.

The Cycle of Negotiation and Warfare

The sequence of opposing developments captured the grim essence of the recent timeframe. By day, political struggles are waged: optimistic declarations are issued from multiple capitals. Immense energy is devoted on restraining specific proposals. By night, the Kremlin forcefully demonstrates the world that, for them, conflict continues to be the primary tool for achieving "settlement".

Nocturnal Warfare

As Russia's attack unfolded into the early hours of Tuesday, the current condition of Ukraine's defenselessness was laid bare. Ukraine is capable of detecting missile launches from enemy soil, a capacity enabled by current data. From witness perspectives, Ukrainian air force fighter jets that had been deployed to counter approaching guided weapons streaked across the sky – modern combat jets provided to Ukraine by European allies.

Moments later, Kyiv's air-defence systems activated: several firings deployed against a hostile projectile. This was a sophisticated defense system at work, probably provided by allied countries. Every launch jolts you unexpectedly, shaking the windows. The moment of terror quickly transforms into grim resignation: perhaps the approaching threat won't strike its target this time, sparing the city from catastrophe and another blackout.

Continuous Dangers

Soon after, a large-caliber weapon opened up on a aerial vehicle close by, part of a defensive team – almost certainly imported technology. Sadly, the shots failed to hit the hostile drone – it continued its flight toward its destination.

With pauses, this carried on until dawn. Kyiv faced the early updates: several casualties, damage and utility failures in numerous residences as a result of the night's assault. As always, everyone still continued their routines – experiencing conflict. But those entire period encapsulated Ukraine's essential dependence on external assistance – a need that European nations are evidently unprepared to fill in the immediate future.

Ineffective Peace Efforts

The 28-point plan from American leadership provoked deep reactions, discussion and deep concern – and temporarily diverted attention from Ukraine's most significant graft case in years. Yet, we have witnessed similar scenarios, after earlier high-level meetings and bilateral conferences.

Every new initiative from Washington adheres to the same pattern: a diplomatic cavalry charge against Ukraine, which Kyiv, with allied governments, succeeds in resisting. They contain the crisis but never actually achieve victory. This pattern will, undoubtedly, endure.

Strategic Calculations

It is tempting to accuse particular leaders of persistently promoting Russian terms. But that does not seem to be the complete picture. American leadership works based on a principle well known to international relations experts: you cannot secure via talks what you have lost on the battlefield. The American government presumes that it is impossible to compel Moscow to abandon the areas that it already controls in Ukraine's southern or eastern regions.

The challenge is that while recognising this factual reality, US leadership does minimal to discourage Russia, through words or deeds, from thinking that the current condition will not shift further in its benefit in the coming year.

Opposing Positions

Therefore, Moscow is convinced that time is on his side – that Ukraine and its supporters are approaching exhaustion. Their reason to sign a deal that does not give them the greatest potential benefit is close to zero. There may be multiple initiatives to end hostilities, but they will continue as long as Russia's leadership remains supremely confident in the conclusion.

On the contrary, Ukraine's government believes that Ukraine can still persist, progressively conceding lives and land but preventing a complete military breakdown until situations evolve in its favour.

Current Realities

Realistically, there are no actual prerequisites for a truce. Now, personal considerations are entering the equation: personal goals to negotiate peace and obtain worldwide acknowledgment, and Ukrainian leadership's dual difficulties – on one hand, not to alienate a key ally, and on the other, to rally Ukrainians around the country's interests against any proposal Kyiv finds unsuitable, so that their attention does not shift toward domestic problems. And although their mission will now be much harder after recent developments, it remains very improbable that this will change their overall approach.

These conflicting dynamics are influencing discussions.

Conclusion and Outlook

It took a mere seven days to terminate the proposed articles of the most recent proposal. Forceful and unpredictable management of the matter by US administration, pushback by Ukraine and the other European countries, along with calming attempts of negotiators, and finally, recent disclosures, all did their job.

While new initiatives based on previous concepts are forthcoming, Kyiv, London and other allied nations should arrive at a critical understanding: Ukraine and Europe will only be able to resist negotiation assaults from Washington that are rooted in Kremlin requirements and reflect particular unwillingness to modify developments, if they maintain solidarity and improve their protective measures at a significantly accelerated rate. If they do, neither political nor armed coercion will be able to overcome them. In the meantime, Ukraine's ability to repel nightly air assaults will, for the coming months, largely rely on sustained allied backing.