🔗 Share this article

The Australian decisive policy to restrict social platforms access for individuals under sixteen is creating waves worldwide. Lawmakers, safety advocates, and guardians are monitoring closely to see if this tactic will become a template for countries abroad.

European Trend

In Europe, a rising group of states are exploring similar measures.

• The Danish government has announced a ban on social media for under-15s, with the prime minister stating that mobile devices and apps are "stealing our youngsters' childhood". The policy is expected to be enacted in the coming year.
• Norway is planning to implement a access barrier of 15, highlighting the need to protect children from the "manipulative force of the recommendation systems".
• Ireland is developing a digital ID system to authenticate the age and identity of social media users. Officials have indicated that an Australia-style ban could be "one of the measures on the table".
• In Spain, the prime minister has called on parliament to approve a proposal raising the access age for accessing social media to 16.
• In France, the president has floated the idea of a ban for under-15s, and a parliamentary commission has endorsed a comparable action, including an overnight "internet blackout" for older teenagers.
• The government in The Dutch government has urged parents to restrict their children from social media before 15.

At the EU level, the EU parliament has approved a non-binding statement supporting a ban for teenagers under 16 except if parental consent is granted. While it warns of the "habit-forming" design of these services, the move does not establish enforceable legislation.

"An effective age restriction is a good foundation," stated one European lawmaker behind the resolution.

The United Kingdom: A Watchful Approach

For the United Kingdom, the administration has not ruled out a possible ban, emphasizing that "nothing is discarded" but stressing any decision must be "based on robust research".

Last year, interest gathered behind a legislative effort to introduce restrictions on social media use by minors, but it was eventually modified. However, the government committed to conduct more studies the matter.

Charities have raised warnings. One foundation established by the loved ones of a teenager who took her own life after viewing harmful platform posts suggests that a strict age ban could fail to make platforms safer and could lead to a "dangerous transition" of harm when users become eligible.

"Australia's ban is a reaction to the inability of the Silicon Valley to design tools that are secure and age appropriate for minors," commented a influential child protection advocate.

America: A Decentralized Approach

In the United States, regulation is mostly unfolding at the state government level amid national gridlock.

• Utah mandates adult approval for those under 18 to use social media and controls late-night use.
• The state of Florida has signed a bill prohibiting under-14s from accessing social media, though it faces legal challenges.
• The state of Virginia has passed a law restricting minors to one hour of social media access per day, with extra access dependent on a guardian's okay.
• The state of Georgia, The state of Tennessee, and Louisiana have also passed bills mandating adult authorization for teenagers to create social media profiles.

Even with widespread concern and proposals from certain figures to mimic Australia's lead, a nationwide ban is right now seen as improbable.

Global Outlook

Beyond the West, other nations are similarly taking action.

• Malaysia aims to ban social media for those under sixteen starting from next year.
• Brazil has lifted the minimum age for the platform Instagram to 16.

But, world agencies adopt a more cautious position. Unicef has warned that age-based restrictions carry risks and "could have unintended consequences". The body points out that online platforms can be a "vital connection" for isolated young people and that government action should not be a "substitute" for social media firms to invest in child safeguards.

As this worldwide conversation unfolds, the steps of the Australian government and several other countries demonstrate that states around the world are no longer content to stand by for platforms to act voluntarily.